data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a83d5/a83d5c36c268d92a67f51bfe457e6e86d9aa6b09" alt="Bulkr pro alternative"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cc95/9cc9594886884ed13838dc9fb6ef31571acc36bd" alt="bulkr pro alternative bulkr pro alternative"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae8db/ae8db60c33dbc9700bda9ad8713bdf9783f091f4" alt="bulkr pro alternative bulkr pro alternative"
(Note, all the photos here are from the X-T1) I wanted to answer for myself how practical using the X-T1 as a primary for wedding might be.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/578c3/578c359f3045cb7a693eba5d02beb404b8056495" alt="bulkr pro alternative bulkr pro alternative"
I've used the X-T1 in the studio and in natural light. It performed perfectly in those roles and other than the small difference in saturation, you can't tell the difference. In both cases, I was using an external studio strobe or multiple remotes. I've used the X-T1 for portraits and a Senior Prom shoot right next to my Nikon D800. I've read and posted about photographers dumping their heavy Nikon and Cannon gear and switching to the X-T1 for wedding photography. On the second, I'm the primary photographer. I'm going to attend 3 weddings in three months this year.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a83d5/a83d5c36c268d92a67f51bfe457e6e86d9aa6b09" alt="Bulkr pro alternative"